![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Reviewing and so on
Aug. 9th, 2003 02:25 pmIn response to the responses to ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
destina's already-famous post, zvi_likes_tv said in this post:
Underlying my viewpoint is a distrust in the ability of authors to argue from the text they actually published as opposed to the story in their head. [...] Too often, I think authors take the position that their intentions, motivations, and interpretations are the important part of a story, regardless of whether or not those are communicated to the audience.
( This got me thinking )
destina's already-famous post, zvi_likes_tv said in this post:Underlying my viewpoint is a distrust in the ability of authors to argue from the text they actually published as opposed to the story in their head. [...] Too often, I think authors take the position that their intentions, motivations, and interpretations are the important part of a story, regardless of whether or not those are communicated to the audience.
( This got me thinking )
