It's my fault because I accepted criticism of my book that I knew to be untrue....
The earlier post responding to the criticism says, and again I quote:
You're right.
You're pretty much right categorically and without exception, and I'm sorry to have mislead you for a moment into believing I think anything different. I will say that the book of mine you threw across the room is, in part, actually intended to address the point you make about it, but I obviously failed for you as a reader in doing so, and I'm sorry.
In the first statement she says she 'admitted to criticism she knew to be untrue.' In the second, earlier statement, she says that criticism is 'right.' I don't see how that can be interpreted as anything but lying.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-08 11:47 pm (UTC)It's my fault because I accepted criticism of my book that I knew to be untrue....
The earlier post responding to the criticism says, and again I quote:
You're right.
You're pretty much right categorically and without exception, and I'm sorry to have mislead you for a moment into believing I think anything different. I will say that the book of mine you threw across the room is, in part, actually intended to address the point you make about it, but I obviously failed for you as a reader in doing so, and I'm sorry.
In the first statement she says she 'admitted to criticism she knew to be untrue.' In the second, earlier statement, she says that criticism is 'right.' I don't see how that can be interpreted as anything but lying.
Edited for clarity.